If you are an administrator at an institution that offers hybrid or fully online courses, you might consider reviewing the Department of Education's report "Fraud in Postsecondary Distance Education Programs" published in October of last year.
Available in PDF format here: DOE Report
Two days after this report was published, a New York Times article was released titled, "As Online Courses Grow, So Does Financial Aid Fraud"
Verifying student identity is a key component to preventing this type of nonsense. Institutions will have two choices moving forward: create cost and time intensive internal measures, or select an outside vendor experienced in dealing with these types of issues.
What is your institution doing?
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Friday, December 9, 2011
Digital Proctor Awarded Top 100 Product of 2011
Digital Proctor Awarded Top 100 Product
Readers’ Choice Top 100 Products of 2011 District Administration
magazine, A Leading Provider of Smart Solutions for K12 Administrators
District Administration Announces Its Readers’ Choice Top 100 Products
of 2011 from a Record Number of Nominations. All Products Are Credited with
Making a Difference in Education by Helping to Support Education Innovation.
Contact:
Judy Faust Hartnett, editor in chief of District
Administration magazine jhartnett@districtadministration.com
Norwalk, Conn. – November 21, 2011 —The 100
winners of the District Administration
Readers’ Choice Top 100 Products of 2011 were announced today.
The
prestigious acknowledgement is given annually to K12 education products that
have supported education innovation. The winners werehttp://www.spectrumk12.com/exceedautodemo
selected by the editors of District
Administration from hundreds of nominations submitted by readers, including
school superintendents and district-level directors in districts across the
United States. The winning products were determined by the quantity of
nominations received per product, as well as an evaluation of product quality
based upon readers’ nominations and explanations.
The
District Administration Readers’ Choice
Top 100 Products awards program provides senior district leaders with the
unique opportunity to learn what products their colleagues around the country
are using and how these products contribute to the success of their districts.
There were a record number of nominations this year.
“The
nominations offer a view into the inner workings of how districts use products
to help solve particular issues,” says District
Administration’s editor in chief, Judy Faust Hartnett. “The recommendations
we receive include extensive descriptions from school administrators of how
these products are used in their districts and the difference they have made,
making it very challenging to choose only 100 products. We hope these products
and their accompanying testimonials will provide a valuable resource for our
readers.”
About District Administration
District Administration is a monthly publication covering all of the important topics faced in
today’s K12 school systems. With a circulation of more than 73,000, District Administration reaches top
decision-makers in virtually every school district across the country.
Subscribers are district-level leaders in K12 education, including
superintendents, assistant superintendents, curriculum directors, business
officers, IT directors and federal funds administrators. For more information,
visit www.DistrictAdministration.com.Thursday, September 22, 2011
Thursday, September 1, 2011
It's Not Just About the Erase Marks
As I pointed out in our sister-blog at studentidentityverification.com, a recent article in Bloomberg spotlights a growing trend in K-12 education, in which teachers are changing student answers on standardized exams to ensure proper passage rates.
"People are quick to blame standardized exams for being inherently too "high stakes" and therefore say that this type of behavior is almost a natural product of a system that relies on such tests.
"People are quick to blame standardized exams for being inherently too "high stakes" and therefore say that this type of behavior is almost a natural product of a system that relies on such tests.
There's a parallel between this type of activity in K-12 and situations where faculty members in higher education feel like they have to lower their standards and just let students, who otherwise wouldn't, pass their course to meet metrics like graduation rates, etc.
De-emphasizing high stakes exams is often touted as a solution, but that's just adding tape and gum to a leaky pipe and ignores the underlying problem. Namely, that students do not know the material."
-StudentIdentityVerification.com
-StudentIdentityVerification.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
